Debating the Populist Pariah : Changing Party Dynamics and Elite Rhetoric in the Swedish Riksdag

Summary, in English

Radical right populist parties have often been treated as “pariahs,” being excluded from coalition politics in parliamentary democracies. We argue that negative rhetoric targeted at radical right populist parties in legislative debates is used by the established parties to distance themselves from such parties and that the incentives to do so depend on the political context. Using sentiment analysis of speeches in the Swedish Riksdag from 2010 to 2022, we find that rhetoric targeted toward the radical right Sweden Democrats is more negative than speech concerning other parties on average. We also find that this negative rhetoric declined over time, particularly from the center-right parties, as the formerly marginal Sweden Democrats gained more seats and became a potential partner for cooperation. Our analysis demonstrates how tracking parliamentary discourse provides insights into changing party dynamics. Our findings suggest that, as the prospects for populists' pariah status change, rhetoric from established parties reflects this shifting role in party politics, with enduring negativity accompanied by reduced hostility among the center-right parties with the greatest potential for cooperation.

• Author: Esther Calvo; Hanna Bäck; Royce Carroll
• Department/s: Department of Political Science; LU Profile Area: Natural and Artificial Cognition
• Publishing year: 2024-05-14
• Language: English
• Pages: 950-961
• Publication/Series: Political Research Quarterly
• Volume: 77
• Issue: 3
• Links: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10659129241253220
• Document type: Journal article
• Publisher: SAGE Publications
• Topic: Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
• Status: Published
• ISBN/ISSN/Other: ISSN: 1938-274X